There are always a large amount of websites on the market that utilize the word "future" inside their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is preferred often by print publishers and editors that the term "future" is a good word to use in titles, as it grabs people's attention. But, when people utilize the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of another of things type website asked me to write a column, but in reviewing the internet site I came across it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side of things, and more heavy in to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are the articles about new scientific innovations in the current period or happening right now? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they are seriously interested in scientific discovery that's already happened, not what'll be in the future. That is just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I do believe they can do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to make people think, worried that you will get too far from your mainstream, quote "core" group of viewers, which I believe they don't even understand.
Of course, as an entrepreneur, I know exactly why they get it done this way. It is really because they want to make money and thus sink to a lower degree of readership, while still pretending to share the continuing future of stuff. Once the editor wished to protect such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I realize that your website is mainly a news site and I ask what does which have to do with the continuing future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something like this; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is all about Science News and is an accumulation of everyone else's news, then it is just a copy site of a variety that's already getting used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore the same, so even when the articles are written more clearly and easier to understand, which can be nice, still what's the value to a "science news junky" as you will find hardly any articles on the webpage compared using their competition?
If they called themselves a news site, then you can have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the future or they could keep carefully the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a training to all or any "Futuristic" type websites as an instance study. If you take the future thinkers to your website and have nothing to show them, they'll leave. If you are using trickery to get regular readers there, you're doing a significant disservice to the continuing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions since the be all end all. Either way, it's unethical to utilize this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment